There has been an accusation floating about for the past several months about the tea party movement. For those who do not know, the tea party movement is a grass roots movement that has been in existence since around April of 2009. In that time, this movement has grown to the single most powerful grass roots movement I have seen in my lifetime. One of the consistent accusations by those who are political enemies of the movement is that the people involved are racially motivated. The only thing even remotely resembling evidence they have had to offer has been a miniscule percentage of signs with racist statements on them caught by camera at tea party rallies.
Well, the results are in, and the question is this, "do the results of the elections seem to justify the claim that the tea party folks are a racist bunch or not?" Who was elected that would most clearly benefit from the tea party philosophy?
Republican Jaime Herrera became Washington state's first Latina representative in Congress.
Marco Rubio is the country's 7th Latino Senator and the first GOP senator since Mel Martinez resigned in 2009.
Tim Scott and Alan West became the first Republican African American members of Congress to enter the House since 2003 (both backed by Palin).
Nevada elected its first Latino governor in Brian Sandoval (Republican).
Susanna Martinez (Republican) is New Mexico's first female governor and one of the country's first two women of color governors.
Nikki Haley (Republican) of South Carolina became the country's second Indian-American governor, the state's first woman governor, and one of the first two women of color.
Also, three Senate candidates that were put forward by the tea party but failed to be elected were Sharon Angle, Christine O'Donnell, and Linda McMahon. Therefore, the representation by females in the U.S. government would have been much higher had some of the tea parties' female candidates won. It looks like they weren't a bunch of male chauvinists either.
1 comment:
I really like this post.
Post a Comment